>>16767091
Accusing me of using chatgpt because you can't rebut the evidence is the most transparent form of intellectual surrender. It's a cheap, ad hominem tactic you're using to avoid the humiliating fact that your entire argument just imploded.
You are factually wrong, and you know it, your attempt to use 80000 years to explain a 7-million-year divergence wasn't a clever point
you have abandoned the debate because you lost. No counter for the genetic proof linking us to African apes. No explanation for the unbroken chain of hominin fossils found only in Africa.
Utterly the definition of a bad-faith argument, because you cannot defend your own failed position. It's pathetic,the evidence remains untouched, the consensus of science remains unchanged. Your attempt to rewrite human origins with a single article has been destroyed not by an AI, but by basic, undisputed facts,the floor is yours, either present a substantive, evidence-based rebuttal to the points about genetics and the fossil record, or concede that your entire premise is nonsense.

No more childish diversions..