Nukes are as real as the holocaust. The nuke hoax, not the holohoax, is the true lynchpin of the post-war world.

Neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, the “nuke” dropped on Hiroshima would have left 98% of the U235 (half-life 700 million years) intact and spread around the area. To put Hiroshima in perspective, the claimed u235 release would have been between 5%-125% of the u235 released in the Chernobyl disaster. Official narrative is that 100% of this was sucked up into the stratosphere, despite the very low altitude of the “detonation” (1500ft), an absolutely absurd claim.

Neither had increased cancer rates, large longitudinal studies were conducted as cancer rates were (of course) expected to increase after such an attack, yet rates were indistinguishable from baseline.

Neither had circular blast radius, as would be expected from a real nuke

In Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”

Both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared.

Nukes are fake, oligarchs are grifting faggots. Just another iteration of the “do as I say or the sun will stop rising” psyop they’ve been abusing for millennia.

Neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, the “nuke” dropped on Hiroshima would have left 98% of the U235 (half-life 700 million years) intact and spread around the area. To put Hiroshima in perspective, the claimed u235 release would have been between 5%-125% of the u235 released in the Chernobyl disaster. Official narrative is that 100% of this was sucked up into the stratosphere, despite the very low altitude of the “detonation” (1500ft), an absolutely absurd claim.

Neither had increased cancer rates, large longitudinal studies were conducted as cancer rates were (of course) expected to increase after such an attack, yet rates were indistinguishable from baseline.

Neither had circular blast radius, as would be expected from a real nuke

In Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”

Both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared.

>>514791166
Flat earth, hollow earth, and these type of “history is fake” (ancient aliens, ancient advanced civilizations, lost supertechnology etc) are psyops to disparage actual conspiracies and the fact that the oligarchy has been faking history for centuries.

Look into any of the litany of nasa fakery, from the moon landing hoax to the current iss productions (lots of videos of obvious wire work, gravity on the “iss”, blue screen errors etc) and what do you find? The entire space is astroturfed with flat earthers and space-is-fake retards. The intent is to get you to reject the actual conspiracy based on proximity to ridiculous fantasy conspiracies. Just like the astroturfed DEW/micronukes etc explanations for the WTC collapse is used to slander the fact that the WTC was a controlled demolition.

The uptick in fantasy conspiracies like OP stems from the current situation of mass awakening to the reality that politics has been entirely fraudulent since 1913 and probably since at least the Napoleonic Wars. The oligarchy play is the same one they’ve been using against us since 2016: try to drown out legitimate discourse with bullshit spam.

>>509924122
Correct.
>>509936805
>>509925933
This.