4chan Search
6 results for "4db8754599df2b49b48deda22b0060e3"
I miss how this board was 5 to 10 years ago. It's bittersweet to see new people join and primarily discuss 6th gen while the original non-NEET posters hit their 30s and 40s and even 50s and moved on with their lives.Time is a bitch.
>>725089562
The chances of there being ANY good Star Trek media in this decade are literally zero, so you have no choice but to content yourself with Star Trek adjacent media.
In fact, if you have any love or respect for Star Trek, that's the only way you will ever experience Star Trek related content, because you absolutely should not be rewarding the corpos for raping Star Trek's corpse over and over again.
The chances of there being ANY good Star Trek media in this decade are literally zero, so you have no choice but to content yourself with Star Trek adjacent media.
In fact, if you have any love or respect for Star Trek, that's the only way you will ever experience Star Trek related content, because you absolutely should not be rewarding the corpos for raping Star Trek's corpse over and over again.
>>720674579
>>720675662
>>720675935
There's an old patriarchal standard that men's sexuality is dirty, foul and lustful, while women's sexuality is pure and chaste. In fact, there was a common belief in the Victorian period that women didn't even feel lust or sexual pleasure at all and sex was something desired only by men and women simply endured for the sake of procreation and her husband's happiness.
The thing is, feminists still 100% hold on to some version of that belief. They say that they're opposed to the "patriarchy" but that has essentially never been true. They're motivated by "man bad, woman good" and (ironically) personal resentment of more attractive women. Sometimes there's cases where women are being treated as sex objects, but 95% of the time "objectification" and similar claims is just them clutching their pearls over perverted men befouling this pure woman with their filthy, corrupting lusts, even if it is merely to gaze at her lustfully.
>>720675662
>>720675935
There's an old patriarchal standard that men's sexuality is dirty, foul and lustful, while women's sexuality is pure and chaste. In fact, there was a common belief in the Victorian period that women didn't even feel lust or sexual pleasure at all and sex was something desired only by men and women simply endured for the sake of procreation and her husband's happiness.
The thing is, feminists still 100% hold on to some version of that belief. They say that they're opposed to the "patriarchy" but that has essentially never been true. They're motivated by "man bad, woman good" and (ironically) personal resentment of more attractive women. Sometimes there's cases where women are being treated as sex objects, but 95% of the time "objectification" and similar claims is just them clutching their pearls over perverted men befouling this pure woman with their filthy, corrupting lusts, even if it is merely to gaze at her lustfully.
>>516037199
Deal with it ZoomZoom.
Deal with it ZoomZoom.
So anyway why is 30 old and 40 is toddler
