The objections in this post collapse under close reading of the Tanakh itself since the prophets describe both a suffering messiah who would be rejected and cut off before the second Temple’s fall (Isaiah 53, Daniel 9, Psalm 22, Zechariah 12) and a reigning messiah who brings peace and gathers the nations (Isaiah 11, Micah 4, Zechariah 14). Judaism after the first century reinterpreted the suffering texts to avoid their clear messianic meaning, but earlier Jewish sources acknowledged them. The claim that Jesus changed or annulled Torah ignores Jeremiah 31 and Psalm 110 which foresaw a new covenant and priesthood, while the end of sacrifice after 70 CE lines up with Daniel 9 and Hosea 3. Genealogical objections are moot after the destruction of records, while Jesus’ Davidic line is preserved both legally through Joseph and biologically through Mary. The charge of idolatry overlooks that the Hebrew Bible itself depicts divine-human figures like the Angel of the Lord and Daniel’s Son of Man who receive worship. The one-time-fulfillment standard has never been realized in history, but the two-stage pattern is consistent with how God fulfills promises throughout scripture. In this light Christianity’s claims are not only intact but better fit the total prophetic picture.