>>718789375
would that be a problem?

>>718619849
Boys like this get modest female social benefits and chad dick when they dress like girls. Also if you look like pic related dressing like a regular dude just doesn't make sense.

>>40543331
>but i have yet to see a SINGLE instance of a dude who looks really effeminate naturally.
Either you have ridiculous standards for what you consider a girly boy or you aren't look hard enough

>>40543331
>but i have yet to see a SINGLE instance of a dude who looks really effeminate naturally.
Either you have ridiculous standards for what you consider a girly boy or you aren't look hard enough

>>212980236
Unless you look like this, then suck my dick :)

>>715814021
There's a lot to say about katyonak but ugly is definitely not one of them

>>40287972
Have you considered pursuing Katyonak? He'll talk to just about anyone on discord and is pretty naive

>>40223229
/lgbt/ just keeps forgetting intersex people exist. Some AMABs are born with ovarian tissue producing estrogen or a messed pituitary jacking them up with prolactin (like pic related)

>>713119438
>I'm done with nintendo
I'm not

>>40090652
>Why are there not more femboys that look like this?
Because fetishistic gross retards co-op'd the femboy term in hopes they'd get the same social desirability as pic relted

>>712451512
Naturally androgynous twinks have basically won the genetic lottery, which makes troons upset it wasn't them and schizos upset because they think can't get laid