>>718885937
>>718886035
The performance targets you want have literally never been obtainable, and never ever will be.
Cope more retards
>>718886035
>Your refusal to answer the question sincerely
Why would I? When I answer 5090 you'll make it about how I'm a good goy or shill or something, anything else you just reverse my poorfag insults.
>>718886137
And it shouldn't be if we're discussing native. We have dlss and framegen now, the target should be 1080p 60fps internally on a card of that class for ultra settings.
Imagine a world where every new release is path traced. It could be reality if amd niggers and poorfags stopped complaining