>>82115892
>If we take what you say as true, why would any woman choose someone with a neutral trait when she has access to men with good traits that you don't have?

Because you would be the one giving her affection. You would be the one giving her emotional closeness. I watched a video of a sugar momma in her 40s who essentially said that she could pick up a random young stud off the corner of the road to bang her. These women want companionship with an attractive man.

Personally, I'm not looking to be spoiled by some old, rich woman. I just want a woman who would give me a place to stay and function as a provider, but I feel that I would necessarily need to date down for this to happen. As a 7 to 8/10 26-year-old man, I would be lucky to get a 5/10 36-year-old woman to be a provider. In reality, she would likely be a 3/10 41-year-old woman. I'm also mentally ill with at least OCD, so she would have to put up with that, even if I were very sweet to her and did a good job in bed, along with all the housework and some cooking.

>Once you reach Chad-level, generally speaking, most women will be happy to finance your life.

So most women would want to be sugar mommas for me? I believe this happens with attractive women, not attractive men. Women don't have as much money as men, and once again, people are pretty damn poor in the 2020s. Wealth inequality is at ludicrous levels now.