>>40938348
>regurgitates the empirically unsubstantiated dogma he’s had shoved down his throat by his perceived authority figures as if it’s proof of anything other than the severity of his own indoctrination

Regardless of how low the particle density is within a vacuum chamber, the alleged force of gravity is unable to prevent the pressure from seeking equilibrium when exposed to a surrounding vacuum of comparatively lower pressure, and that’s at the surface where gravity’s alleged affects are supposed to be strongest. Gravity provably never prevents gas pressure from seeking equilibrium, and furthermore, gas pressure cannot even exist void of physical containment by the very definition of the term ‘gas pressure’ itself. This topic has also already been beaten to death countless times in countless threads including your inevitable cope about gradients. Educate yourself on The Parbox by thoroughly reviewing ALL of the posts linked itp >>40932907. If you actually invest the time and effort necessary to comprehend the concepts being discussed in the archived posts I’ve just linked you to, you’ll no doubt realize that the claim of earth’s atmosphere existing adjacent an alleged vacuum of space is easily refuted with a simple experiment anyone can conduct for themselves. Or, more likely you’ll stick you head in the sand and avoid even considering the irrefutable proof which completely destroys your religious belief structure. Either way; it’s a waste of my time to keep beating this dead horse with anons who clearly have no interest in honest discourse. Im not interested in hearing your tired fallacy riddled script for the nth time. You have nothing new to add to the conversation that hasn’t been posted a thousand times before in a thousand different threads.