>>23449023
>>23449028
And you didn't get what I meant you goddamn moron. You're wasting posts in this thread postulating nonsense while making analogies that I've openly criticized as inaccurate because they miss vital factors. You're trying to compare them to suspension bridges because they experience similar forces but there's a monumental fuckload of other factors that make this analogy really, really oversimplified bad. I didn't reply to most of theirs because I didn't have glaring problems with theirs the same way I've heard exaggerating the hell out of these supposed problems. This whole thing started with complaining about the inconsistent durability of space o'neill cylinder colonies being threatened by weapons and explosions that should be a needle-sized attack on an object the size of a building. I chimed in to point out it's more likely that these colonies are more heavily defended in the first place, not disagreeing with unicorns terrorist attack being influential, because for colony drops to be remotely viable they need to survive atmospheric entry in the first place. I didn't citizens their other replies as needing a fact check by experts. Only yours. An o'neill cylinder altogether is an unrealistic hypothetical which we continue building models improving on. It's not today's end all be all model.
