>>149566176
>Anon when is it standard procedure to edit out the majority of an answer you are directly asked by your interviewer?
Since the invention of the press. Did you think that the "editors" position meant nothing? If you've stepped outside of your right-wing echochamber, then you would know that media of all kinds don't stick with their initial take. Have you seen blooper reels or behind the scenes shit?
Music, movies, films, interviews, and games are all edited.
>At that point why didn't they just edit out the question Entirely? If you can't see the obvious social engineering going on I'm sorry you're retarded.
There's no social engineering, you're just extremely ignorant about the world and are gullible enough to parrot known liars who commit cryptoscams.
