>>106298175
>>106298271
>Comparing distortionless Stax with fucking closed back chinkfiman
Why are you like this? Seriously, why shill this out of all things? Is it fine that it sounds like shit because it's fifty bucks?
>Scales well with dac and amp
What does that even mean? They're 60 ohm, it's not like you need a super powerful amp for these. And all DACs should sound the same if engineered correctly.
>planar speed and detail
This isn't a thing. The speed of the driver won't alter the sound signature, at most it might result in lower distortion. Planars or electrostats aren't inherently more detailed. Detail is something that purely depends on the frequency response. Chinkfimans usually have a fuckton of treble hence the "detail". Stax also tunes their stuff to be bright and that's why they appear detailed. Apply a negative treble shelf and you'll notice the sensation of detail is gone.
>>106297487
Shouldn't be an issue. I've used far more leaking cans with mics before (like some Stax) and never had an issue. It's mostly about mic positioning.
>>106295874
That's (mostly) true.