>>516704896
Geeeeeg, so this means that, at best, there would a slight decrease in the number of H-1B applications? Because a 100K one-time fee would still be more profitable to most companies (at least in the long term) compared to hiring local workers. Not to mention, that H-1B actively reduces wages in the most affected sectors, so the profitability grows even further over time.
>"Got what I voted for"
Lol, lmao even.