>>64108659
>The initial observations of these parts without magnification showed little observable
information
>A reliable test could not be developed at the time of this document to test the effectiveness
of the secondary sear notch.
>examination of the subject weapon did not independently provide evidence of an
uncommanded discharge
>could not make it happen on command
There is literally NOTHING in that article that supports your ridiculous claim. To the contrary they literally state there's no evidence it happened and that there is evidence something got into the holster next to the trigger. They gloss over this as though it's not relevant which throws this laughable evaluation into the dumpster.

You want to try again, bitchmade faggot?