>>76413097
>in the political position of "all hierarchy is artificial and bad, all differences can lead to conflict and ought to be flattened out"
this is a straw man. historically speaking, this hasn't been the position of the anti imperialist left. this is more a position of the anarcho radlibs, AKA basically "leftists" who call themselves anarchists or "anti-authoritarian." the anti hierarchy types embrace something that has been actively promoted by the CIA. the anti imperialists tend to respect things like natural gender norms, however the anti hierarchy types you mentioned are brainwashed by liberal academia into believing that anti imperialist regimes are "fascist" rather than pragmatic.
>>76413120
Leninism is anti imperialism
>it failed
to varying degrees, it actually has been successful. it turned an undeveloped eastern European backwater into a superpower in less than a century. it turned the sick man of Asia into a superpower. smaller regimes like North Korea have been able to develop themselves successfully while maintaining a modicum of national sovereignty and independence that no Western country currently enjoys thanks to the vicissitudes of international capital (wall street, london).
where Leninism has fallen, such as the Soviet Union, this is largely attributable to infiltration by Western intelligence and the promotion of ideas that were meant to seduce the Soviet elites with decadent Western liberalism. essentially, the elites were enticed to betray their own nation by the West.
>>76413133
it's helpful to know the origins of that poison, otherwise you might be predisposed to believing that everything can be explained by the Jews or by the Freemasons or by the reptilian humanoid Illuminati Jesuit whatever, like some low IQ faggot
