>>106465424
>Meta has a strict "no smut fine-tuning allowed" clauses in their licence on all models
(Shown front and center here: huggingface.co/meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct/tree/main )
>Countless nsfw tuned llama models just floating around on hugging face, whether they be from popular tuners like drummer or complete nobodies
>Never heard of a single one getting removed accept maybe that gpt-4chan one

So does the license actually matter? Do they actually give a shit whether or not you fine-tune a model to be better at smut or is it just to appease the "le heckin safety" crowd? I want to upload my own high parameter tunes to hf in the future but I don't want my account getting nuked if they're very strict about licensing or rules or whatever