>>18155665
It’s too young to have a proper name yet beyond the vague umbrella of “””nationalism.”””
It’s basically where socialism was before Marx created a formal theory for it in the early 1800s.
It’s still in many ways incoherent but it is coherent enough in its rejection of liberalism just as liberalism at its birth was incoherent in many ways yet coherent in its base rejection of feudal heirachy and tradition.