>>18089687
>Liberalism only succeeds in a deeply socially conservative society.
That's why I'm increasingly not a fan of liberalism itself. I think liberalism itself is what destroys social conservatism and traditional values via individualism, materialism, and social atomization. The only exceptions so far are very homogenous societies like Japan, but even then I'd argue liberalism is what's killing Japan due to the protestant work ethic grindset meme imported from Germany and the postwar U.S (which funny enough is now becoming a problem in Western countries too on top of all the other issues we have).
>>18089689
If the U.S truly falls into complete irrelevance due to either a dramatic, violent event or a more gradual if still fast decline due to the browning of the country turning it into neo-Brazil, I'll be achingly sad for the rest of my life.
But I'll take solace in the fact that the U.S under the rule of my people, the "heritage Americans" became the first democratic hegemon since Rome, defeated Germany twice, singlehandedly beat the Japanese at their height, and stared down the USSR to death while inventing electricity, flight, the telephone, the internet, and landing men on the moon several times over, which is considered to be the highest point ever reached by humanity (and could very well be the highest point we'll reach for hundreds of years).
I'll laugh knowing the brown horde so smug about usurping the old stock Whites will never again reach the heights my ancestors and their ethnic kin reached, and that the late 20th century will forever be considered by historians the high point of America and humanity as a whole.