>>17925824
brown doesn't mean anything
the model could be better

>>17925832
> they used much more basque samples than non basque samples,
irrelevant, the basques were separated from the non basques, overall the non basque score low levels of north african ancestry
>The objective of the study was to recreate basque genetics during the iron age, hence why the name of the study is "Genetic origins, singularity, and heterogeneity of Basques", posting a study whose entire focus is basque ancient genetics
no that's irrelevant to the model here >>17925610, regardless of the focus of the study the study also provides a model for non basque iberians to show the impact of population movements on all of iberia, that's why the figure 4 is titled "Modeling potential post-Iron Age gene flow in the Iberian Peninsula"
>and trying to pass it as a representation of average modern iberians is something only an insecure moor rapebaby like you would do
nope, it's a valid modern study, you are insecure if you don't like it

also, as i said, the dendogram you're posting is irrelevant to the qpadm model, the clusters for the dendogram like "gSpanish2" are not used in the qpadm model, that instead separates the samples by region
also you didn't circle all the samples, overall, the samples are more than the ones used here >>17925802 in the outdated lazaridis et al 2014