>>512880826
>that doesnt follow after your initial statement.
It does. I implore you to think a bit harder about selective processes.
You’ve taken the selection process from being a high pass throttle to a low pass throttle.
>if politics was part time? they'll be employed elsewhere, you moron. or they'll be faggy day traders. or they'll be neets. you didnt even read my post you dumb nigger
You've now described back to me what I just told you in:
>>You’d allow for a far worse populace of politicians to be in power.

>what makes our current crop so desireable to you?
The history and tradition is very important.
You’re encouraging an FDR style social populism, essentially.
Which is precisely where the current coalition of Union workers, poor inner city peoples, financiers and socialite elites originally came from in American politics, a disease we’re still yet to be rid of.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal_coalition

>“I’ll have them Micks voting left for the next two hundred years” -LBJ, sort of