>>96371482
>You three, cover the east side" without using an action, even if the dm calls for a deception roll. Is that skirting the rules?
the dm suddenly demanding that it would take an action because of the content of the words demand a deception check to be called even though it would take just as long to say as a non-influence utterance seems really dumb. Doesn't seem rai.

i had some extremely weird dreams if that counts

Your fortune: Very Bad Luck

>>712847607
>deckard cain getting killed by a butterfly fairy