>>512891831
Thanks for the Wikipedia lesson, but throwing around "false equivalence" doesn't win debates

I'm not mixing up topics; I'm calling out when you try to patch unrelated beliefs into one argument.
If you're so sure about your real data, show me solid evidence, not just names and links.

You really think the Democrats are defending illegal immigrants for no reason? No, this is all because your labor costs are too damn high. Without cheap labor... even if it's "illegal", your whole economy grinds to a halt.

Without immigrants, you'd be paying $25 for a burger flipped by some lazy white kid who quits after two weeks.

>>213670023
You can hate them all you want, but pretending they don't matter is delusional. Remove one-fifth of any nation's population overnight and watch what happens to its economy, workforce, and infrastructure. You don't just replace millions of people instantly, no matter how bad you think things are now.

>>512021896
Yeah? there's no contradiction here.

The Quran honestly claims earlier scriptures were altered over time, and historical evidence shows there are countless New Testament manuscripts with significant textual variants.

So yes, these points support each other rather than clash. If you see conflict, it's because you're oversimplifying or misunderstanding the facts.

Why do people only half understand what I say? Is it because I'm not good at English?