>>60949716
>Only if
So by your own admission your previous statements that previous bbby shareholders can never receive cash or equity is FALSE. What then is your purpose here? Someone makes the same verbatim claim every thread that previous shareholders are permanently wiped out when the judge himself as asserted otherwise.
>This is mathematically impossible
Gee Whiz I wonder what happens when you have Ryan Cohen (billionaire), Carl Icahn (billionaire), and Patrick Byrne (10's of millions) all ganging up to fuck over naked short sellers big time. This is why they have gone after IEP so hard because they probably know that Icahn has taken loans against IEP for his BBBY adventures.
So once again, what is your purpose here? Someone verbatim posts that previous shareholders are wiped out and shorts are permanently closed out, but this is verifiably false, and you even admit that this is false when confronted. So one has to wonder what your purpose here is, it is certainly not to intellectually engage in conversation when you are willingly making false statements, that even the JUDGE himself has asserted are indeed false, and you yourself concede are false.
