>>718360012
>literally not what I said at all faggot,
No, it is actually, very literally, what you said. Let's revisit:
>>718357749
>like there are characters that are supposed to be sexy bombshells, but it happens to be a kid's property so they're practically sticks, you can tell they're toned down from the original intention,
And of course the rest of your post is just you bringing up irrelevant things again.