>>718367602
The DLC makes the case a great many times he can't fulfill his own promises and taglines if he's an emotionless robot of a deity, and throwing away his love makes basically everything he's staked his claim to godhood on into a lie
>Trina
Trina says godhood would be a prison for him and she's supposed to be emblematic of his capacity for compassion, a Cerulean Coast cross before the Stone Fissure one also says he had to throw away his doubts and indecisiveness before he could actually commit to throwing away St. Trina

The only character read for Miquella that doesn't stretch proof is that he might have had ideas of being a benevolent god up until the moment he threw away St. Trina, at which point it was ALL power instead of mostly power, and he had to pick away more and more of who he is as a person (literally throwing it away- Empyrean-blood Burgeon items for St. Trina and Miquella both are present at crosses and St. Trina's resting site, Miquella was very literally removing his flesh and aspects of his personality from himself) to even be capable of making that kind of a decision

Godhood is not presented as a good thing to seek, and a ghost at the Stone Fissure cross asks why in the absolute fuck he threw away St. Trina, the embodiment of the love he says he would rule by

The obvious answer is that Miquella's own conclusion for a new age of love was to remove conflict through charming everyone (the Hornsent himself says this outright that the only thing keeping him from attacking everyone was Miquella's charm, in Ansbach's case Miquella also had to dull his wits considerably to keep him in line and it STILL didn't keep him from looking for crosses to figure out what he was doing), and failing a charm, Radahn will just kill them if they cause conflict