>>281188432
>I'm not engaging with your argument because you seem to lack basic human empathy
>>281188794
You're feigning injury. Where's the fault in my characterization of you as a judgmental/emotional poster, with intellectual inability to engage with differing viewpoints?

You've dismissed several posts out of hand, leaving only pithy remarks, while justifying it with your opponent having failed to uphold a basic standard of ethics, essentially barring them from human status in the debate.

This viewpoint, and resulting mode of meeting and communicating with other humans is arrogant to the extreme. You will likely continue to dehumanize your opponents forever, since your "values" are so superior.
Meanwhile threads turn to shit whenever someone like you comes along, because you cannot spare even a modicum of effort to debate your own viewpoints under pressure.
Fragile.