>>519367024
You're throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks. Let's clarify
Morality: Calling it a 'social construct' doesn't mean it's meaningless. Law is also a social construct, but you'd still cry foul if I stole your wallet. Your argument is an excuse for moral cowardice
Slavery vs. Other Oppression: A medieval peasant had rights and was a legal person. A chattel slave was legal property, whose children were born as property. Equating them is historical illiteracy.
The Economic Claim: The idea that slavery wasn't foundational is a flat-earth level of economic denial. The capital from the slave trade and slave-labor plantations directly funded the banks, insurance, and infrastructure of the Industrial Revolution. This is documented economic history.
You're not presenting facts; you're presenting a jumble of debunked talking points to avoid the overwhelming evidence of history.