>>513001641
Casualty ratios != casualties.
Remember, casualty ratios beyond 3:1 really only happen when one side is effectively stone-age

>>513001965 >>513001882
>you are making a lot of assumptions. first you're entire argument is assuming the drones being delivered are all strike drones. you can have really big drones like a shahed or a small one like an fpv.
The only assumption I'm making is that a drone is functionally equivalent to very-high-quality artillery.
The rest is historical precedent.

>picrel is just an example, you can consult most war historians and get a similar synopsis (especially WW1-focused)