>>96311436
>you could call anything i post now cheap cad slop, but lets see
I'm approaching this in good faith. I class GSC as the last "good" warhammer range, because the scale is good, the level of detail is modest, and almost the whole range is the classic legs/torso/arms/head modularity. I own about 1500 points of them. However, the vast majority of that range is now 9 years old, which means it was designed over a decade ago. Your pic is 6 years old, which means it'll have been designed about 8 years ago, before the rapid-onset enshittification set in. I wouldn't class that as releasing 1 good model for every shit modern one, because the magus is no longer modern.

>>96311461
These look decent but I can't find them on the webstore, what are they?

>>96311412
Actually yes, decent sculpts and proportions and good level of detail. Having looked at the sprues for the fire dragons as an example though, it's a shame that they still come in so many parts but each part only fits 1 build, like left leg 32 has to be glued into body C in a specific pose but only after you've created body C by gluing torso bit 51 to torso bit 52, and then you can glue right shin 81 onto right thigh which was already attached to torso bit 51. Needlessly anti-hobbyist. The sculpts are faithful upgrades but the kit is a big downgrade from the ethos of middlehammer's fully modular plastic kits. hence why I printed 1250 points of fully modular eldar a couple months back, for 3rd and 4th edition games. I want to make mydudes with unique poses and kitbashes, I'm not wasting my time finishing building James' kits for him after he cut them into 8 random pieces