>>151176455
>you’re stupid if you don’t think this is a thing where the perceived lower status isn’t a turn on for you.
This is straying too far into specifics of attraction which is highly contextual. While an element of power is certainly appealing to me that doesn't mean it's a guaranteed positive across the board for everyone, nor does it crucially need to be the girl who is lowered, I can easily get that same sense of power from a variety of options that are either consensual submissions or relative to only myself without needing to degrade or reduce a girl.
Since we're on the topic of power dynamics we can look at another form of it that while you can easily say "it's desirable because it's power" you can't just assume too much about the why's of how it's desirable. In dominant and submissive roles the way these are expressed and treated are impossible to categorize because every single person who takes part in them has their own view of what they like about it. Just as you have guys who want power an see women as trash, you also have guys with the same power dynamic interests who see women as tools, some who see them as pets, some who see them as companions, some who see them as trophies. The ways they go about enforcing these dynamics and showing it to others can be very different. As can the way they want to be seen for it, the way they want the girl to react, the way they want their dynamics to fit into society as a whole. You could try to design a fetish simulator that old handles power dynamics and even with literally trillions of customizable settings you'd never have enough to fit every single user's specific interests.

I agree that in the specific case of girlfailure you can point to power dynamics as a basis for attraction and it would cover 85% of those interested in it guaranteed. But beyond that it's going to get much much less certain of why it's power dynamics and how it's power dynamics for each person.