>>719857042
>this is like saying that many people have the ability to do maths inside them
No it isn't. Mathematics is a basic requirement for human living. Creativity ought to be but in our modern day it isn't, so actively pushing for more people to be creative is the correct choice to make, and AI ills that initiative
>when people go to an art gallery (or sit down to watch netflix) they're trying to get something that they cannot do themselves
So artists who go to an art gallery are actively incapable of making art of that scale? You fucking serious? Especially when modern art galleries are complete scams with shit paintings like picrel. Most people just go to observe, not because they're incapable of achieving artistic merit. I'd argue nobody is incapable of that if effort is put in, artistic nature can be nurtured
>so therefore to be a creator you have to be creative in a way that is above and beyond the norm
Eh questionable. Depends on what your goals as an artist are. I personally think art is more an expression of the self, though at the same time I don't value postmodern/surreal "interpretations" which are the norm nowadays. Also how is AI "above the norm" lol, everything AI makes looks the fucking same, stop coping
>use it through krita so you can draw over the top of it. it's much more fun
So... tracing? Tracing is not creative at all kek