>>718703027
Because it's not a portal. Portals on the other hand, WOULD lead to that, and why? Because 2 portals share the same world, therefore, if a moving platform in a motionless and still room has a portal, and goes over a motionless object, and the exit portal, is in the same motionless room, a room equally as motionless as the object itself, the object which appears on the exit portal will be......????????? YOU GUESSED IT!!! MOVING!!!

A.pes cannot have it both ways, and they can't address this. Once again, they apply logic which would only be remotely coherent absent of the fundamental contradiction in the hypothetical, to the hypothetical, so the A.pe is defeated on 2 fronts, both by their dignification of the hypothetical in the first place, but then also their application of premise which can't exist in the hypothetical.
In other words, they have placed a sign on themselves that says "retard", but convinced themselves it doesn't say that.