>>510166449
>Finally getting some definitions from you. No capitalism is the free market.
That wasn't a definition. That was an observation of a characteristic.
Capitalism is a for-financial-profit operated economy.
>Two farmers,
Barter is not capitalism. Commerce is not capitalism. Commerce is not capitalism. Although they can exist inside of it, in spite of it.
>As soon as the government issues money
Government does not issue money. Banks do.
>the market is no longer completely free
Typical cope that ignores government, and certainly its origins, are inside of the market.
>When the government issues fiat currency
Banks do. Unless you're saying banks are the real government and the pretend government works for them. Then we agree.
>the year the Federal Reserve was created.
Muh central banks. But non-central banks are completely fine.
>You cannot redefiine
Observing and describing, not defining or redifining. That's jewish faggotry. It's jewish faggots (like the one goldbugs huff the farts of) who come up with a definition and interpret or misinterpret observable reality around it. Muh praxeology.
