>>509718905
To the ambitious, contentment in and acceptance/respect of natures moods and cycles may seem melancholy or mournful, I guess. But, I rather like your take that this is all resolved by/in HOPE. But not a passive hope, but one which is both defiant and "divinely wrathful" ("raging light"?) as necessary to achieve balance.
Point #2: It is not for nothing that the ancients always said that only those who did not want power were deserving of it. If we truly believe in natural law / dharma, any leader must wholly put aside their desires, and act as a pure conduit for the immanent will (i.e., justice, wisdom, righteousness); no more, no less. No private desires, no special interests, and esp. no jews. Haha. Only in this way can the leader be the true center of the greater wheel; and do all this (necessarily) without movement and without fail. A mirror, as it were, in this world, of the God (however you conceive it) who accomplishes all yet does not act. This is why I like the notion of the "Mandate of Heaven," and the Taoist notion of "wu wei" (no action).
