>>282132608
How? We're still arguing about whether yuri subtext exists and whether lesbianism is censored in Japan. The only thing that has changed are the examples.

>clearly whoever censored her didn’t know that
You don't know that. In fact, they made a clarifying statement later on rather than reversing it, despite knowing what the director thought, so it seems pretty clear what the intention is.

>How is it subtext if there’s on screen marriages?
Because in the three later examples, they were subtext before they became explicit. In one: you saw them living together and sleeping in the same bed, getting jealous over another girl trying to flirt with them, etc. before it was revealed that they got married. I specifically use examples like this because I don't want to get bogged down in arguing whether about the author's intentions for a specific series.

>I don’t know why you keep saying that subtext is an unresolved plot point,
Subtext is the author's intentions. So by definition, an unresolved plot point would be a kind of subtext because the author intended to write more. But you don't know if the author wanted an unresolved plot point.