>>17919306
>Wasn't Fascism a middle class phenomenon in England? In Germany it seems like sole proprietor tradesmen and small business owners made up the bulk of the early DAP support.
A lot of them back then, yeah. Also in France. If you ever look at any of these right-wing organizations that existed in the 1930s, that was the core of it. Obviously there are no pure political ideologies or movements, and they draw in people from different social classes. But you see some of this stuff today with hipster fascist (or adjacent, politically reactionary) scenes around tech and they try to have a "dark" and edgy hipster vibe.

Fascist aesthetics are also often about trying to well-dressed and "clean." Sleek. Sharp branding. Greco-Roman symbols. Toss in some military stuff. It's supposed to be aesthetic and kind of erotic.

Look at Passage Publshing for an example.

>>17919328
>into weird volkist-style mysticism and "naturalism" (carnivore diet, "raw water", healing crystals, muh sneed oils, antivaxx, etx.)
Yup

>>17919435
>You follow the leader and the capital backing him or you get punished for being a bad dog. If you follow Trump, support Israel and the corporate agenda you can be as chuddy as you want in public short of openly calling for a race war and grift like crazy.
At least here in the U.S., the Republicans have always been like this, really. During the Bush administration, there were white nationalist side-conferences going on, and the establishment didn't really care, provided that people, at the end of the day, supported Bush and the war.