>>513597112
You failed to answer the question.

No, I think the burden of proof falls on people claiming that this complex and fascinating universe that can be scientifically studied, just popped out of nothing for no reason or has always existed for no reason despite scientific evidence of intelligent design proving the contrary, such as the Fibonacci sequence or there not being evidence for an increase in genetic information throughout time and random mutations. Of course, the testimonies of millions of people throughout the centuries also and archaeological and historical evidence for Jesus Christ in light of what the Bible describes in regard to the Messiah.

It doesn't matter how much time passes, a tornado will never automatically arrange a bunch of debris into a beautiful Ferrari that demonstrates intelligent design and a knowledge of beauty. Yet atheists claim random chaos produced life and humanity and everything out of nothing and for no reason, and have no way to prove this wild claim. On whom does the burden of proof really fall, when it is evident we live in a created world?

Richard Dawkins stumped by creationist question --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JacFylDG7cU

"The Information Enigma" --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA-FcnLsF1g