>>938336895
im both of these posters you fucking retard

Can /pol/ give me ONE (1) good reason why consensual adult-child sex should be illegal without resorting to logical fallacies?

I'll wait.

Can /pol/ give me ONE (1) good reason why pedophilia is "wrong" without resorting to logical fallacies?

>>3977420
I genuinely do not understand the appeal of these character designs. However, there are some very talented artists that draw them very cute. So I won't complain too much. Plus, I'm not really in the business of trashing other people's favorite shos.

Can /pol/ give me ONE (1) good reason why pedophilia is "wrong" without resorting to logical fallacies or feminist talking points?

>>509558689
>Its illegal in the united states and most countries to advocate for the sexual exploitation of children
It's illegal in most countries to counsel another person to have sex with a minor, which I have never done. I have only ever defended an ethical position, and advocated for a change to current laws, which is entirely within the law. The fact that you are so ass-blasted by my threads that you're trying to report me to the FBI is highly satisfying, thoughever.

Is pedophilia actually "wrong", or is that just feminist propaganda? Many societies have accepted pedophiles throughout history, and allowed children and adults to enjoy sexual relations with each other. Personally, I believe it is absurd to claim that all pedosexual relationships are negative.

>>936565357
too early

Can /lgbt/ prove to me that pedosexual relations are wrong without resorting to logical fallacies and debunked feminist talking points?

Can /pol/ explain to me why pedophilia is "wrong" without resorting to debunked feminist talking points?