>>64214783
>dude lmao you're losing more than 50% of them to attrition towards the target.
could be 80% and it would still be better than risking a single 777 and it's crew
Iraq was 20 years ago, if FPVs existed back then coalition forces would have seen insane apc and tanks losses considering what garbage ied were able to do

>>64214800
criticizing the messenger will not change reality
pic related even russia who's entire battle doctrine depend on tube artillery has accepted it
it is just not economically viable anymore