Imagine if a man raped a woman and people started justifying it by calling it "male infatuation syndrome".
>"Oh, it's okay, bro, you just have male infatuation syndrome. He didn't rape her, guys, he has male infatuation syndrome! He just couldn't control himself. He was so infatuated with her, he just had to grab her and fuck the shit out of her without her consent. It's okay, guys!"
This is the exact kind of bullshit women do though and they have ruined science a la pic-related ever since they entered it after gaining social and political freedoms and power. If this isn't the case, then why do we see women doing this bullshit constantly in their personal lives?
"Oh, Chad is using me for sex and I know it? I'm going to call that a situationship and pretend it's a type of relationship even though I know it isn't really at all and I'm just getting fucked for basically nothing in return, if anything at all, because I don't want to look like a whore by calling this what it actually is."
It's the fucking same for:
>"Stockholm syndrome", oh, I fell in love with an evil abusive man who kidnapped me, boo hoo!
>"Battered woman syndrome", I just can't leave him even though he beats me every night, I can fix him, he loves me!
>"Trauma-bonding", Tee-hee my pussy gets wet when Chad yells at me :)
>"Postpartum psychosis", I can't believe I'm going to be a mother and I went fucking insane
>And worst of all, "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome" which isn't so sudden and mysterious after all, but just infanticide by the mother!
Women should not be in fucking science. Men are honest about each other and women, and not only that, but we actually have the capacity to self-govern our impulses instead of treating every message from our amygdala and genitals as gospel. I am fucking tired of science bending over backwards to defend the crazy parts of female psychology.
Women have ruined science with euphemism and mental gymnastics
