AI music isn't replacing non-AI music because you can't copyright wholly-AI generated works which means there's nothing to stop someone from just stealing whatever AI song you generated for themselves

There. That's it. That's all you need to argue against AI. None of this "muh feels" bullshit. All AI content must be public domain because it uses landfills of copyright material for its training data. This is the simple fact of AI. Sure you can still profit from it, but the profit margin is small when anyone else can just take the same exact songs for themselves.

>But artist are incorporating AI into their workflows!
Yeah but if only 10% of the work is done by AI and 90% of the work is done by artists then it's not really AI anymore. Dumb argument to make all around

>>18131507
>>18131709
>Lovecraft said this during the peak of British rule over India
But I thought colonialism was le good thing...