>>106321435
Your security is only as strong as its weakest link, and the encryption algorithm won't be it. As >>106322118 points out, even if the algorithm were somehow backdoored, to use it in any legal procedures they'd have to admit they have a backdoor, which they won't.
You can have things encrypted perfectly and still not be safe. Instead look out for various other mistakes you could be making. Is part of the data stored outside the encrypted container (or has it been in the past; deleting a file does not erase its contents from the physical disk)? Is there any caching or metadata processes (e.g. thumbnailing) happening on unencrypted storage? Is your RAM getting swapped to unencrypted storage? Is your keyphrase safe? Do you have the keyphrase stored anywhere in human-readable form? Is all the software you're using safe? Have you been drawing attention by describing your situation on honeypot sites like 4chan?
There are many, many things that can get you in trouble even if your encryption is perfect. Focus on the weakest aspects of your security rather than overoptimizing an already strong aspect.
