>>512016472
>>512016545
>this might be true, but I don't like the implications of it being true
I'm sure the same people then turn around and say niggers are better athletes because of their superior genes or that the male loneliness epidemic is just natural selection.
To play the devil's advocate there are currently a lot of people with good genes, who are not as attractive as they could be because of the shit food we eat making them fat and bloated.
>>512018142
>Aborting babies because you can't be bothered to raise a child? Go ahead, slay queen!
>Aborting babies because they have a debilitating genetic disease that will make them suffer? NAZI!!1