Search - 4rchive

>>725148189
>Again, this is what bothers me about Engage discussion. The game is kinda frankly solved and it's too obvious what classes and builds units should go into, so people started making up fake distinctions to differentiate the samefag characters. People are talking about some hypothetical game that isn't Engage, and not actually Engage. None of this shit MATTERS, anon!
>Paladin bases, growths? Who gives a frick. It's shit for combat compared to Warrior, and it can't fly, and emblems/forges/skills determine 95% of your damage. There is no good, solid reason to pick a Paladin over a Warrior or a Wyvern 99 out of 100 times. They cover all its realistic use cases collectively, and it doesn't manage to find anything substantial by splitting the difference down the middle.
>Micc!Hortensia does all lategame warping and high-tier unless you're doing some LTCfaggotry, or massively coping. You don't *need* staff bots that can use A staves other than her.
>Everyone is pigeonholed into these hyper-optimal roles and you feel like an idiot doing anything outside of that, because unlike Fates where you sometimes had to use an Oni or a Dark Knight or a Ninja because you didn't have a Malig, you never HAVE to use anything except a Warrior in Engage.
>>725148038
>Forgot your AI image bro