>>106367672
>collective moderation.
>recreating plebbit
The core of chans is anonymity and the equality of posts, laying their value in their content, not how many fags upvoot it, or which fag posted it.

>>106368058
>moderation is all about deciding which posts are harmful to discussion, while upvotes are all about giving an absolute value to posts (it's a quantification)
Thus you say: Your type of moderation is deciding am absolute value of harmfulness. the same as upvotes.

>>106368348
>I prefer a benevolent dictator over democracy here because there'd be many dictators to choose from.
Aren't you describing modern democracy?

>>106368689
>3. Run posts through a small locally hosted model which evaluates if a post is on topic, simple pass/fail. Repeated fail submissions = ban
Which decent model you recommend that won't require a supercomputer to run?