>>513443374
>the state could decide what you're allowed to say
'could'? its fact and happening on a large scale fucking jew
>90% agree
yeah sure after canceling all the voices disagreeing

>>513444642
>(unless we pass a law against it)
who's (((we)))? tiny hat users? you already created a book full of laws against it

fuck of filthy kike, you days are numbered. just because you control the public narrative doesnt mean people think like this, you just cant see it.