>>16748238
>The universe isn't 6000 years old.
Let's take this one that sounds pretty much indefensibly stupid to me. When it really comes down to it, you have no clue whether it's true or not and no possible way to ever find out. You just prefer the illusion that makes more sense, gives you greater social capital, and seems to integrate better with the immediate past and the immediate future.

Political garbage like race and IQ isn't science or math. The issue with wikipedia isn't politics—the dominant political faction will always control political messaging in any sphere—it's that wikipedia has a yeast infection of old retards like this guy growing in it, who like delusional old childless cat ladies failed at life and now treat wikipedia as a proxy child they seek glory from and try to bubblewrap every square inch of by having automated bots that go around reverting the most benign apolitical edits. You can't even correct a simple miscopied number from an obscure math paper without one of these dipshits coming in to waste everyone's time.