>>11379760
>2.5d style
Yeah, the first pic is pretty bad. I forgot some of the artist/style tags I normally use and then didn't wanna change the style to drastically for the rest of the set.

I really like how this one turned out though, but I'm definitely starting to understand why detailed backgrounds aren't always worth it. I probably spent just as much time trying to tame the silly railings (and they're still not perfect) as I did doing cleanup on eyes, hands, other details.