>>12132459
Daily reminder that the claim is:
>A 16MHz 68000 was $15 dollars back in 1984, by 1988 a same speed 68020 was already at $5 dollars
Also, a few mhz may seem insignificant now, but at the time it could make a massive difference in price. See https://archive.org/details/computer-shopper-february-1988/page/478/mode/2up for an example of how much more a few mhz could cost you.
>>12132463
>price marked down
>That was a mark up by that retailer,
lmafo
>most other retailers were selling the chip at a much cheaper price.
No they weren't. If they were you could provide sources that back up your claim instead of cope that doesn't.