>>511284189
If your kid got into furfag porn you failed as a parent. Note I said "parent" not "parents". Change my mind.
>Oh but they got around a sniveling connivers law on one state
The only children Arizona cares about are anchor babies.
>>511284305
>because those are human and not intended for furfag sites
Is it really e621's fault that all of you degenerates just absolutely love that tagging system? Sure it is. It's fucking great which is why you keep indulging in it.
