>>718411470
See: >>718411480 you stupid fucking nigger.

>>718411546
>Holy retard. There is literally nothing to stop hundreds of those drones. There isn't a single army in the world capable of effectively shooting down those kind of small drones.
Directed energy weapons work more than well for that purpose. The Epirus Leonidas for example.
Those small drones are also exceptionally vulnerable to other forms of electronic warfare, as they're small and cheap, so can't have adequate hardening or speed to avoid it. If they did, you'd end up just having a traditional ATGM.
>No EW works even in Ukraine war, where they constantly tweak and upgrade their EW systems.
Literally up to 80% of drones used by the Ukrainians fail to reach their targets due to EW. It takes up to 40 minutes to get them on target.
>Also fucking optic fiber drones exist which are absolutely invulnerable to it.
And are also ridiculously less maneuverable, to the point they are far easier to detect and shoot down than FPV drones. They can also be tracked back to their launch sites very easily, considering the fiber optic cable they leave behind.
>Retard thinks air force is magic. They dig mortars into the ground in the forests, completely covered by the trees and trap doors, so that they won't be spotted from the drone.
And then those mortars can't fire at anything, and are effectively suppressed, allowing the enemy to advance and maneuver. Hiding means you aren't fighting.
>Holy retard, every single element of those combined arms is vulnerable to drones.
As they are to artillery, air force, being shot and blown up in general. Somehow they still exist and work well, wonder why that is?
>which are literally cannot be countered by fucking anything
DEW, C-UAS and EW all counter drones adequately.
>will be absolutely fucking REKT
No. Your shithole country will get curbstomped.

>>718411558
The FPV drone is incapable of flying at cat level far from the pilot and in an environment full of EW.